Post by TorenceHow about advancement within the Craft perhaps even to Grand
Mastership?
While a candidate, advancement is through the degrees. While a Master
Mason, advancement is through the line, through concordant bodies,
through service, through fellowship, through charity.
Post by TorenceI think it interesting that during candidate development, even in
modern candidate education programs, at least here in Illinois, the
quest for position in our political branch is never offered up as a
possibility for their choice.
Go through line and once you're a Past Master there's a high chance
you'll be asked if you're interested in various types of service at
the Grand Lodge levels. In Illinois it appears that the DDGM corps is
charged with finding their own replacement among the PMs of their
district.
Post by TorenceSimilarly, in officer education programs, the prospect of forming
additional lodges is never suggested. To me it seems that a select few
from among us have managed to acquire for themselves a privilege to
decide such matters.
And yet when is the last time a lodge dispensation or lodge charter was
denied by a Grand Lodge? In the two jurisdictions I'm a member of that
has not happened in living memory.
Your point about not mentioning is valid. How much of that is because
our population was declining for so long? After the previous peak it
became more important to preserve the existance of lodges than to
charter new ones. During the previous peak the style was large lodges
not small ones.
Post by TorenceWe fail these days to invite candidates for Masonry to take lodge
office. Most newly raised Masons have a chair assigned to them once
they are raised. We administer lodge office the same way that we
administer the oaths and obligations.
I don't understand this comment. There are still plenty of lodges where
new candidates have to go through the chairs or the lodge fails to fill
its line. This is true for fewer and fewer lodges each year in the new
trend of popularity.
Post by TorenceIs it peculiar for me to want options to be defined and a clear choice
to be made by the novitiate? Or should we continue in our modus
operendi as we always have done before?
To me it's about context of progress. Getting a candidate through his
degrees. Presenting options once he's a Master Mason one of which is
the line. Presenting options once he's a Past Master one of which is
serving in a Grand Lodge office of some sort.