Discussion:
Ethics in FreeMasonry
(too old to reply)
Torence
2009-06-28 23:53:26 UTC
Permalink
As our group well knows, FreeMasonry has been in business now for a
few hundred years. In that time millions of other business, profit,
non-profit, and fraternal, came about and were delivered to the world,
only to wane and mildew and end up, to put it mildly, into the trash
can of oblivion. Something keeps us relevant particularly to the
Laboring Age men who operate our local lodges. Many of us lucky ones
are in business elsewhere and cannot help but to apply our learning
from this little club, to the experiences and purposes in those places
that clothe us and feed our families.
Thirty years ago, when I started out in business, companies that
are recognized under the law as entities called “inc.” or “ltd” only
had a singular purpose, “to proceed in the interest of the
stakeholders within the limits of the law.” During the last half of
the 20th Century business learned, often too late, that if they expect
to be treated as a personality that, like a person, that function
would make for an awful one and is insufficient. The public, the
courts, the executive and lastly the legislature, who in America are
supposedly the only parties that can engage themselves in the details
of commerce and be the overseers, expect companies to also recognize
that there is a moral imperative to what they do.
The techniques and tools of business have been applied to
Freemasonry over the years often have mirrored trends in other fields.
During the 1950’s for example, business hired executives from the
military who often put out a "mission statement." Most American Grand
Lodges actuated by a fear of Communism adopted or revised a
Declaration of Principles at that time. I have always found the one
used in Illinois to fall short. It talks more about whom FreeMasons
are not in the States rather than who we are.
If we were to devise an updated Declaration of Principles for the
Twenty-first century, what notions would you want represented
understanding, of course, that these thoughts should be similarly
applicable to business? What do you take from your lodge into work
with you?

Fraternally,
Torence Evans Ake
Senior Deacon – Auburn Park No. 789 – Crete, Illinois
PM – Arcadia Lodge No. 1138, Lansing Illinois
Justice
2009-07-04 11:11:39 UTC
Permalink
Freemasonry is the oldest and largest world wide fraternity dedicated
to the Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of a Supreme Being.
Although of a religious nature, Freemasonry is not a religion. It
urges its members, however, to be faithful and devoted to their own
religious beliefs.
http://www.moralkings.com
Rob Sandilands
2009-07-10 10:08:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Justice
Freemasonry is the oldest and largest world wide fraternity dedicated
to the Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of a Supreme Being.
Although of a religious nature, Freemasonry is not a religion. It
urges its members, however, to be faithful and devoted to their own
religious beliefs.
http://www.moralkings.com
... of course, you need to bear in mind that there are other branches of
Freemasonry that have no religious/deist stance whatsoever ... and that
when you use the term 'Freemasonry' as a general description, it can be
read that you would include those groups ...

Rob Sandilands PM
Warwick Lodge 160 UGLQ

I don't suffer from insanity ... I enjoy every minute of it ...

Thomrich
2009-07-05 05:21:20 UTC
Permalink
Very often, in business and professions (such as law and medicine) the
term ethics is applied when what is meant is manners. Don't step on a
brother's feet, and the sort: ie, don't invade my turf. This same
trend is reflected in some of the practices and "doctrines," in modern
Freemasonry. Freemasonry is often seen as a franchise operation, with
the franchise agency setting the rules, and making sure that the right
style of napkin is bought, and the right territory is served. And
that the right customers are allowed to buy.

A statement of ethics may not be the same thing as a statement of
principles or morals. Principles and morals are much more variable
from age to age than are ethics, and should be expressed in somewhat
more universal terms than a statement of principles or operations
procedures. I have nothing specific right now, but some brainstorming
might come up with something.

Steve Brettell,
Secretary, Birmingham #188, Maryland
Treasurer, Fiat Lux #1717, District of Columbia
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...