Discussion:
How is the Grand Master elected in your country.
(too old to reply)
Leroux Alain
2010-02-02 21:32:49 UTC
Permalink
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
ptk1071
2010-02-03 15:02:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leroux Alain
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...
In the GLoNY the GM is elected by a vote of representatives (3 elected
officers of the Lodge or their proxy) of all constituent Lodges in the
jurisdiction.
KIV11
2010-02-03 21:19:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by ptk1071
In the GLoNY the GM is elected by a vote of representatives (3 elected
officers of the Lodge or their proxy) of all constituent Lodges in the
jurisdiction.
Bill, just to make a clarification, at the annual communication of the
GL of NY, F&AM held on the 1st Monday and Tuesday in May, only one
representative from each lodge is seated. That representative, either
the WM, SW, JW or Proxy (who must be a past master) is given the
responsibility of casting the Lodges' total number of votes. Each
Lodge gets one vote plus another vote for every 50 members in the
Lodge after the first 50 members is counted. Past Masters and sitting
Masters do not get their own individual vote as in some other
jurisdictions. Current Grand Lodge Committeemen and past and current
Grand Lodge Officers get their own vote.

George K.
ptk1071
2010-02-04 17:36:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by KIV11
Post by ptk1071
In the GLoNY the GM is elected by a vote of representatives (3 elected
officers of the Lodge or their proxy) of all constituent Lodges in the
jurisdiction.
Bill, just to make a clarification, at the annual communication of the
GL of NY, F&AM held on the 1st Monday and Tuesday in May, only one
representative from each lodge is seated. That representative, either
the WM, SW, JW or Proxy (who must be a past master) is given the
responsibility of casting the Lodges' total number of votes. Each
Lodge gets one vote plus another vote for every 50 members in the
Lodge after the first 50 members is counted. Past Masters and sitting
Masters do not get their own individual vote as in some other
jurisdictions. Current Grand Lodge Committeemen and past and current
Grand Lodge Officers get their own vote.
George K.
Thanks George I was generalizing and not as clear on the details.
thanks for clarifying that for me and the OP.

Bill A.
Doug Freyburger
2010-02-03 21:19:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by ptk1071
Post by Leroux Alain
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...
In the GLoNY the GM is elected by a vote of representatives (3 elected
officers of the Lodge or their proxy) of all constituent Lodges in the
jurisdiction.
That's also true in Illinois and California where I hold memberships.

But the Worshipful Master of our lodges are also elected. How many
times have you ever seen that contested? Moving forward though the line
of officers and through the grand line is so common that contested votes
are so rare they get discussed for years.

I've been through the line twice so far and I have yet to see a vote in
lodge that was not unanymous. I've seen brothers drop out so I've seen
officers stay in office an extra year to catch up (I was in the East
both 2007 and 2008 for that to happen). I've seen brothers drop out so
I've seen officers skip a chair in their progress to the East (I skipped
from Junior Deacon to Junior Warden in 2005 when that happened). But so
far I have not seen two or more brothers nominated for a chair at any
local lodge election.

The system is quite conservative in how it works. Brothers dropping out
of line for one reason or another tend to filter out most need for
contested elections, but in the end each VM appoints one or more
brothers into the progressive line making the system insular. A lot
more brothers drop out of the line than step into the line and extremely
few step in by running against a progressing incumbent.

During the years I was in line in California there were no contested
elections on the grand line. A couple of years before I entered the
line in Illinois one GM failed to win reelection (local tradition of
serving two years). I think the result was the other chairs bubbling
up a year early. One of the years I attended GL in Illinois the
starting chair in the grand line was contested. The result was the
appointed incumbent won the election and the chairs progressed on plan
in spite of the contest. Not large changes in either case.

So to me the question isn't how the GM is elected, but how the junior
chair in the elected grand line is selected before he is presented for
election.

In California there's a committee for selecting the Senior Grand Deacon.
The committee takes applicants from the PMs of the jurisdiction but the
committee is the current grand line plus some PGMs. To really change
the GL in California you'd need to serve on committees and/or in
appointed grand chairs to demonstrate enough dedication to make it into
the grand line. Also, Masonry may consider no man on account of worldly
wealth or honors, but the grand line is more expensive than local lodge
membership. It takes wealth in addition to dedication to get into the
progrssive grand line. Once in office the year as Senior Grand Deacon
is probational. Then the elective sequence starts.

In Illinois I haven't checked on the selection process in the same
detail but the probationaryu process seems to start at the
appointed Junior Grand Deacon leading to the elected Senior Grand Deacon.
Alan Schwartz
2010-02-04 04:23:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Freyburger
Post by ptk1071
Post by Leroux Alain
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...
In the GLoNY the GM is elected by a vote of representatives (3 elected
officers of the Lodge or their proxy) of all constituent Lodges in the
jurisdiction.
That's also true in Illinois and California where I hold memberships.
But the Worshipful Master of our lodges are also elected. How many
times have you ever seen that contested? Moving forward though the line
of officers and through the grand line is so common that contested votes
are so rare they get discussed for years.
My understanding from brethren in MW Prince Hall GL of Illinois
is that contested GM (and WM) elections are not that uncommon there.
Post by Doug Freyburger
I've been through the line twice so far and I have yet to see a vote in
lodge that was not unanymous. I've seen brothers drop out so I've seen
officers stay in office an extra year to catch up (I was in the East
both 2007 and 2008 for that to happen). I've seen brothers drop out so
I've seen officers skip a chair in their progress to the East (I skipped
from Junior Deacon to Junior Warden in 2005 when that happened). But so
far I have not seen two or more brothers nominated for a chair at any
local lodge election.
I have. It wasn't all that pleasant.
--
Alan Schwartz, PM
Master, Berwyn Lodge #839, A.F. & A.M., Berwyn, Illinois, USA
Royal Arch Mason, Lincoln Park Chapter #177 RAM
32nd deg. Scottish Rite Mason, Valley of Chicago, AASR (NJ)
Torence
2010-02-04 15:16:13 UTC
Permalink
In Illinois, a "consensus opinion" of the Past Grand Masters
selects the next Grand Officer who is an ambitious individual willing
to perpetuate their design. In the twentieth century, The Board of
Grand Examiners exceeded their original mandate and grew to act as a
College for Grand Line Officers. A sense that there is something wrong
with the process is had when out of a role of 70,000 memberships we
have only a singular choice for office; and then only once every other
year. Something can also be said to the affect that something has
sullied the office Grand Master when from that membership of 70,000 we
can only find one man willing to stand for it.
The representatives of the constituent lodges then dutifully go
through the motions and give their choice the veneer of democratic
election.
I have a few more active years involved here then Alan or Doug;
and, we have had choice on occasion. But the choice never came from
the field; but out of a division between groups of Past Grand Masters.
We have an uncommon number of living Past Grand Masters at the moment
and our last scuffle from 2003 & 2004 has seemed to get them to better
work, better agree, or retire.
If your Grand Lodge Library has copies of our proceedings, then read
through, for example, 1985, 1989, especially 1992 & 2003. For an
organization that prohibits electioneering, we have been known to out-
do the Chicago City Counsel in drama; and I admit that I have had
something to do with upsetting that particular apple cart from time to
time.
The improvement would be to suggest a name for Junior Grand Warden
who has never had anything to do with the Board of Grand Examiners.
That recommendation is not stated as any reflection on this particular
board; but to correct the process. Our ForeBrothers knew the trouble
with the Board at its inception following the Overseers of the Work
and Conservator’s Association trouble in the late nineteenth century.
We were promised then, that the Board would not ever be what it
became.
The correction would be to suggest a name of someone who has never
been anything but an active Officer of our constituent lodges. Also,
the best candidate for both Progress and Good Order, will have had
nothing to do with the Rites other than, say, carry a dues card. I
would accept an alternating choice, one from the field as I have
described, and one from the Board, to affect the transition. I am not
warm to the notion of any Grand Lodge Officer being suggested who was
high this or that from the Rites. Perhaps if the right man came along
from that back ground, I would set aside this prejudice. But, I would
have to study him hard.
We need no Grand Line Officer who has designs; but keeps them to
himself thinking that when he is Grand Master he will then make
changes. The thing to do is to suggest the Brother whose inclinations
are well known; and who has worked to make alterations before agreeing
to put himself on the path to the Grand East.
Our current Grand Line is the best that I have seen elected in my
Masonic lifetime; and they have shown the strength of character that
is in and of itself, refreshing. I have high hopes for when they
graduate that they will go to promote a genuine fraternity, “Rightful”
both in its design and its actions.

Fraternally,
Torence Evans Ake
Secretary – Auburn Park Lodge No. 789 – Crete, Illinois
PM – Arcadia Lodge No. 1138 – Lansing, Illinois
Janet Wintermute
2010-02-06 19:01:25 UTC
Permalink
Years ago, I had a conversation on this subject with a Virginia
mainstream mason, who told me that the man put onto the lowest rung of
the Virginia progressive GL "line" is hand-picked by the sitting Grand
Master.

So the phenomenon Torence described in Illinois (the consensus process
among the Past GMs) seems positively enlightened by comparison.

Yet the "net-net," as the business community says, is the same. Both
jurisdictions and any others using similar methodology would be
guaranteeing same old, same old, in perpetuity. Because we all love to
see our own great ideas perpetuated and our own personality and
temperament mirrored in our successors, thus validating US.

In Virginia (presuming what I described in sentence #1 is still true),
it would take just one really enlightened Grand Master to institute
change. He'd have to figure out what needs to be fixed in his corner of
the masonic world, put up his periscope, find an individual *capable* of
that kind of fix (i.e., a change-leader), and select him for the
bottom-rung appointment. Ironically, in Illinois' way of going, that
process would be hugely harder. The Illinois Past GMs would have to
come to consensus on the new pick, which means they'd pretty much all
have to be in line with wanting change--not just one GM wanting it.

"Change" wouldn't have to be so important except that we seem to be
dying on the vine.

--Janet
OMaurizio
2010-02-03 21:19:43 UTC
Permalink
In Grande Oriente d'Italia from some years the GM is elected from all
the MM of Italy, before the GM was elected by the Worshipful Masters
of all Italian Lodges
Maurizio
Post by ptk1071
Post by Leroux Alain
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...
In the GLoNY the GM is elected by a vote of representatives (3 elected
officers of the Lodge or their proxy) of all constituent Lodges in the
jurisdiction.
jack Wise
2010-02-03 21:52:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leroux Alain
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...
In Texas, The Grand Master is elected by Grand Lodge.

Each Lodge present at the Annual Grand Lodge casts 3 ballots. Each Past
Master of a Texas Lodge present casts one vote. A majority of all votes
cast is required for election.
--
Jack Wise
Stuart H.
2010-02-04 02:45:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leroux Alain
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...
In Alberta, usually we do not elect the GM or DGM, since they are
uncontested moving up the Grand Line. Electing the other GL officers at
the annual communication is done by 3 votes for the three senior
officers of each Lodge which may be carried by proxy by any one of them,
and each MM in attendance has one vote. Thus, if you have a favourite
candidate from your Lodge running for Junior Grand Warden, and you can
get enough of your member MMs there to vote, he has a good chance of
being elected.
Were there a contested election for GM or DGM, the same rules of voting
apply, as does voting on motions and Constitutional Amendments.
Each District holds its own Annual Meeting many months in advance of the
GL communication (ours is about 8 months ahead) at which we elect next
year's District Deputy Grand Master, who will be Installed at the Grand
Lodge Communication the following year. Thus we elected our "DDGM
Elect" last October and he will be Installed at Grand Lodge in June of
this year.

Stuart H.
Steve Crane
2010-02-07 21:57:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leroux Alain
I would like to know how your grand master is elected, to compare with
our country...
Two jursidictions I am familiar with.

Idaho - The incoming Grand Master chooses a Past Master from somewhere
in the state to serve as Grand Pursuivant. He then serves at the "will
& pleasure" of suceeding Grand Masters through all the chairs - Grand
Pursuivant, Grand Swordbearer, Jr. and Sr Stewards, Marshall, Jr and
Sr. Deacons until at last arriving at Junior Warden where he is then
voted in each year as Jr. Warden, then Sr. Warden, and then Deputy
Grand Master. The Deputy Grand Master is then the Grand Master Elect
and automatically ascends to the East without further vote. It's an
eleven year committment, not counting a couple years as District
Deputy Grand Master which is typically the case.

Kansas - The Incoming Grand Master choose a Grand Sr. Deacon, who then
progresses through the chairs to Grand Master. While there is a "vote"
each year to "advance the line" it would seem highly unlikely that any
changes might occur.

Steve Crane
Lakeside #42 Sandpoint ID
Creston #54, Creston BC
Topeka #17, Topeka KS
Torence
2010-02-08 14:36:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve Crane
Idaho - The incoming Grand Master chooses a Past Master from somewhere
in the state to serve as Grand Pursuivant….
Kansas - The Incoming Grand Master choose a Grand Sr. Deacon, who then
progresses through the chairs to Grand Master….
So where is it in our constitutions or the stare decisis of Grand
Lodge decision that we gave our GMs and PGMs the authority to select
their predecessors? Wouldn’t it be better for us to choose one from
our ranks, directly and fresh from the experience of operating a
twenty-first century lodge?
There is an essential function that Grand Masters should act upon,
one that has been given them to do by us and our ForeBrothers as an
essential duty to perform. And yet, this occupation has been wholly
neglected by the Grand Masters of mainstream Masonry for several
generations; and one that I perceive at least, to be the Critical
Control Point to revitalize our society for this generation of
FreeMason. It is the condition that Dr. Anderson pointed out as
indolence and neglect on the part of Christopher Wren that
necessitated the organization of the Premier Grand Lodge in London and
a cause once recognized that is easy to agree upon. It is also the
distinction that separates an ordinary Lodge Master from his peers
that would make him a “Grand” one like W. Bro. Paul Revere.
Grand Masters must form new lodges. I raised this point a few years
ago and while I found myself soon summarily suspended without due
process, Illinois chartered its first Lodge in generations (Men in
Brotherhood Lodge No. 1178). We have had no more. (You do not want to
know what happened to Lodge No. 1177.)
The clandestine, irregular or quasi-Masonic organizations, whatever
you may wish to call them, charter new lodges regularly and know the
benefit that doing so provides. Neanderthal prejudices, intrigues,
cultish attitudes for personality have little footing in a club that
is made up of fresh starts. If we cannot select our Leadership from a
new start-up, such as what we have in Lodge No. 1178, here, then how
about a Brother who has recovered a suspended charter and revitalized
it? Illinois in the twentieth century lost half its number of regular
lodges. A few years ago, I plotted them out on a map. If we could
agree that a Grand Master can restore an old charter then we can
blanket the state in new lodges. This project appeals to me as it
would be more of a restoration than an innovation. And every Lodge
Master could then go to work, training young officers not only to
serve as Master and then be done, but to serve their lodge as Master
and then go on to build up a new one.
If I was a Grand Line Officer, this would be my venture.
Fraternally,
Torence Evans Ake
Secretary – Auburn Park Lodge No. 1138 – Crete, Illinois
PM – Arcadia Lodge No. 1138 – Lansing, Illinois
KIV11
2010-02-08 18:40:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Torence
So where is it in our constitutions or the stare decisis of Grand
Lodge decision that we gave our GMs and PGMs the authority to select
their predecessors?
Did you mean successors?

I'm sorry for, from what you say, is the system at work in Illinois,
however, here in NY, the only sure thing is that whoever is elected
Deputy Grand Master will become Grand Master two years later. The
difference here is that becoming Senior or Junior Grand Warden is no
guarantee of moving up in the chairs. I have known several Senior
Grand Wardens and Junior Grand Wardens who have faced opponents and
never advanced past those positions.
Post by Torence
Wouldn’t it be better for us to choose one from our ranks, directly and fresh from the
experience of operating a twenty-first century lodge?
My personal opinion is a big NO. Why? Because there is so much more on
the Grand Lodge level that most Worshipful Masters have no knowledge
of. How many Masters are familiar with interaction between Grand
Jurisdictions? How many sitting Masters even know who the Grand Master
or Grand Secretary of neighboring jurisdictions are? Can you expect
someone to jump onto the Grand Lodge level and have a clue as to his
responsibilities and duties as Grand Master?

I think you need to think this over a bit more before jumping in with
both feet.
Post by Torence
There is an essential function that Grand Masters should act upon,
one that has been given them to do by us and our ForeBrothers as an
essential duty to perform. And yet, this occupation has been wholly
neglected by the Grand Masters of mainstream Masonry for several
generations; and one that I perceive at least, to be the Critical
Control Point to revitalize our society for this generation of
FreeMason.
Bro. Torence, I think you are painting with rather a broad brush. What
takes place in your jurisdiction and obviously has you upset is not
the norm in other mainstream jurisdictions that I am familiar with.

Fraternally,
George K.
PM - Modin Lodge #1153 - Woodmere, NY
PM - South Shore Lodge #1126 - Rockville Centre, NY
PM - South Shore-Long Beach Lodge #1126 (2 times) - Rockville Centre,
NY
Secretary - Modin Lodge #1153 - 6 years
Secretary - Guiding Light Olympia Lodge #808 - 6 years
Secretary - South Shore-Long Beach Lodge #1126 - 7 years.
Doug Freyburger
2010-02-08 23:07:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Torence
So where is it in our constitutions or the stare decisis of Grand
Lodge decision that we gave our GMs and PGMs the authority to select
their predecessors? Wouldn’t it be better for us to choose one from
our ranks, directly and fresh from the experience of operating a
twenty-first century lodge?
Should the Masters and Wardens decide to abandon the tradition and start
electing new men directly into the grand line, then the appointed
brothers will no longer advance.

Exactly how good an idea is it to start campaigning for that to happen?
Since no specific brother would be put forward it would not be
electioneering but you don't want to waste your time. To make it not a
waste of time you'd need a vision and it would have to be a specific
vision. It would have to solve a specific problem not just entrenched
ways. As usual I'm the evolutionary and you're the revolutionary when
we discuss such matters ...
Post by Torence
There is an essential function that Grand Masters should act upon,
one that has been given them to do by us and our ForeBrothers as an
essential duty to perform ...
Grand Masters must form new lodges.
Hmmm. Grand lodges form when 3+ lodges in an existing region get
together and decide they wish to break form their sponsoring GLs and
form their own GL. It is a bottom up process not a top down process.
Local lodges form when 3+ brothers in a populated district get together
and decide they wish to form a lodge and they petition the current GM in
their jurisdiction for a dispensation. It is a bottom up process not a
top down process.

I'm not sure how a sitting Grand Master would go about chartering a
lodge when there are no Masonic clubs or gatherings of Masons in towns
lacking a current lodge. Do you mean he should hang out in a town
looking for sojourning Masons and convince them it's time to charter
their own lodge? That he should sponsor degree teams to make Masons who
live their and encourage them to form their own lodge as soon as they
complete their proficiencies and there is a PM among them?

I suppose that would work in a district with low residential turnover
and so I suppose that's been done in the past. If you could show how it
can be done in the current climate I'd certainly cheer any GM who does
this.
Post by Torence
... Illinois chartered its first Lodge in generations (Men in
Brotherhood Lodge No. 1178). We have had no more. (You do not want to
know what happened to Lodge No. 1177.)
I'm a member of Arlington Heights 1162 in Illinois. We're an 80 year
old lodge. Several lodges with higher numbers are also over 70 years
old. There has been a lack of new lodges formed in recent decades.

MIB Lodge 1178 is one of the best attended lodges in Illinois. They
often get 50+ at their meetings and they are not surprised to get 100+
at a degree. Whatever it is that they do differently, it works
extremely well.

Chuckle - I would like to know the tale of lodge number 1177. I no
longer go to many horror movies at the cinema so the sordid-ness of the
tale should be about right for my tastes.

I like to track US Masonic demographics. There was a large burst of
petitions in the 1950s and 1960s. It was a trend that had started a
couple of decades before building up and the rate of petitions dropped
during the 1970s. I've seen statistics that there is a repeating up and
down trend in the popularity of Masonry in the US in a cycle that lasts
80-100 years. The cycle being longer than almost any Mason survives in
membership, the living members have mostly seen degree rates decline the
entire time they have been Masons until the recent turnaround. Books
that give much older data are rarely referenced but they give a very
different perspective.

In the US there is a generation of elderly Masons who joined during the
previous boom cycle who have spent their entire time in membership
without seeing a new lodge chartered. There was a boom in the number of
members without a boom in new lodges in the last cycle.

There is a new boom going on in petitions and it's at about the
predictable time based on prior cycles. I am very relieved that
Illinois already has a new lodge. I don't know why the previous boom
happened without forming new lodges so I don't know what to try during
this coming boom to help form new lodges.
Torence
2010-02-09 15:21:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Freyburger
Should the Masters and Wardens decide to abandon the tradition and start
electing new men directly into the grand line, then the appointed
brothers will no longer advance.
Not necessarily. We have a “vetting process” for rising GL Officers
here in Illinois that as they advance from Jr. to Sr. this or that,
they also serve for a year on our various committees. This was the
plan of PGM Larry Inglis and the design from which we have enjoyed
some amazing successes as well as some of our more troublesome
episodes. To that vetting process, we need only add that the Senior
Grand Deacon should spend his second appointed year elected to
Mastership in his home lodge or, as I would prefer, a “start-up” or
“restoration” lodge. In that way he would be fresh from the field and
particularly knowledgeable about what affects today’s lodges
positively or negatively. At the very least as a result, we will have
for us a new lodge in the constellation of Illinois Masonry.
Post by Doug Freyburger
Exactly how good an idea is it to start campaigning for that to happen?
Since no specific brother would be put forward it would not be
electioneering but you don't want to waste your time.
I have the time, and the inclination.
Post by Doug Freyburger
To make it not a
waste of time you'd need a vision and it would have to be a specific
vision. It would have to solve a specific problem not just entrenched
ways.
Our “entrenched ways” are problematic. The individual episodes are
merely symptomatic. Setting both aside would make us “more
interesting” sorta-kinda like raising a vexatious question and letting
the Rightful Grand Lodge go to work on it. Or do you not think or
Local Lodge Officers “men” enough to succeed with it?
Post by Doug Freyburger
As usual I'm the evolutionary and you're the revolutionary when
we discuss such matters ...
I like to think of myself more like a frosted mini-wheat, sweet on
one side, rough on he other.
Post by Doug Freyburger
Hmmm. Grand lodges form when 3+ lodges in an existing region get
together and decide they wish to break form their sponsoring Gils and
form their own GL.
In Illinois, the Inglis plan altered the start to 20 Master Masons
and the requisite that a Grand Lecturer blesses its first Master. A
“Restoration Charter” would have no such restriction; with only the GM
to need to be satisfied of the adequacy of the Lodge’s Restoration
Master.
We do not acknowledge the existence of other groups calling
themselves Masons either in our own or other jurisdictions, unless the
Regular Masons of that jurisdiction does so first.
Post by Doug Freyburger
Do you mean he should hang out in a town
looking for sojourning Masons and convince them it's time to charter
their own lodge? .
No, I think that he should have his Line hang out in the Local
Lodges and send new groups of talented Master Masons armed with a
“Restoration Charter” to go to work in neighboring towns.
Post by Doug Freyburger
Chuckle - I would like to know the tale of lodge number 1177.
Lodge No. 1177 was a financial scheme from just a few years ago.
Formed as a repository for non-affiliated members who belong to no
lodge, at least not one that meets or has officers, it was organized
to collect dues payers only who would pay their dues money nearly
directly to the Grand Lodge. Future Grand Masters could then pull
charters and rather than simply collect per capita, the Grand Lodge
would receive the full amount.
Our Rightful Grand Lodge got rid of it.

Fraternally,
Torence Evans Ake
Secretary – Auburn Park Lodge No. 789 – Crete, Illinois
PM – Arcadia Lodge No. 1138 – Lansing, Illinois
Torence
2010-02-09 15:23:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by KIV11
Bro. Torence, I think you are painting with rather a broad brush. What
takes place in your jurisdiction and obviously has you upset is not
the norm in other mainstream jurisdictions that I am familiar with.
Just so that there is no misunderstanding, I am not upset at all. I
can not think of anything more joyous to write about than the prospect
of forming new lodges.
Please note that my Masonic experience is not limited to Illinois.
By the happenstances of employment, I have been enabled to live in the
jurisdictions of and work in lodges of Virginia, New Jersey and
Pennsylvania. None of those places, nor your State, New York,
functions much differently than here especially at the Grand Lodge
level. Just a few months ago we were discussing tensions between your
jurisdiction and the District of Columbia and a bit further back the
tragedy at Southside Lodge. IMHO, such trouble is less likely to
dominate the chatter regarding any particular jurisdiction if our
Grand Line Officers busied themselves by Constituting new lodges. This
conclusion is simply a lesson learned from not only our mutual
history, but by being unfettered from a prejudice that only interrupts
a free discourse with other groups.
Post by KIV11
Did you mean successors?
Yes, thanks for the correction Brother. My mind was thinking
“descendants,” my fingers, “predecessors.”
Post by KIV11
Can you expect
someone to jump onto the Grand Lodge level and have a clue as to his
responsibilities and duties as Grand Master?
Yes, but more than simply my humble opinion, I am describing how
we were first organized to the Original Plan of Freemasonry. Our
ForeBrothers sought to prevent the condition of a GM or consensus
opinion of the PGMs from selecting their descendants here in our
jurisdiction with our Illinois prohibition on electioneering. Some men
who were active at the Grand Lodge level in the last two decades
specifically worked to extend the impure influence of an overly
dominate Committee to write provisions into our law in order to undo
this important safe guard. Now, we have endorsements for candidates
for election distributed by a Brother’s home lodge, if he is willing
to stand for office, as well as a published profile or “resume” that
may include his familial ties, his public occupation or even appending
body affiliations. Is such activity allowed to go on in your
jurisdiction?
Post by KIV11
I think you need to think this over a bit more before jumping in with
both feet.
I have. We can boast, here, 600+ lodges with 1800+ Principle
Officers from which to select who best can work and best agree. If you
add in the book officers, that pool of candidate grows to 3000+; but
for the record I am not overtly warm to the notion of one of us Book
Officers taking the first elected chair principally because of the
lessons learned from the nineteenth century from the Grand Mastership
here in Illinois of Harmon Reynolds. I would view such a candidate as
a transitional orchestrator in the quest to restore mainstream Masonry
in Illinois to function as in the Original Plan.

Fraternally,
Torence Evans Ake
Secretary – Auburn Park Lodge No. 789 – Crete, Illinois
PM – Arcadia Lodge No. 1138 – Lansing, Illinois

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...